Is a prospective customer credit-worthy? Its banking history can provide a lot of clues
Extending credit to customers is riskier than ever. Whether it’s an existing customer looking for more favorable terms or a newer client a company doesn’t have a track record with, it’s best to obtain as much info about the customer’s payment habits as possible.
One beneficial step companies can (but often don’t) take is to check a customer’s banking history first. Banks provide the “additional info” that can’t be found elsewhere during a credit investigation, according to a recent white paper, “Unlocking Financial Trust: The Role of Bank References in Establishing Creditworthiness” from the National Association of Credit Management (NACM).
NACM polled credit & collections professionals on how often they check customers’ banking histories when conducting credit checks:
- 35% said not often
- 25% do so half of the time
- 23% said almost always, and
- 17% never request bank info.
Exactly half of credit pros polled by NACM say their companies lose thousands of dollars per year, as high as $100K in some cases, because they can’t obtain sufficient customer credit data. One credit pro said, “In the last few years, we’ve had about $80,000 worth of credit loss due to fraud and insufficient customer information. We’ve seen an increase in identity theft unfortunately not recognized until after we shipped the product, which resulted in the loss.”
Bankruptcy, fraud keep credit pros awake at night
Banking data can quickly highlight a customer’s or prospect’s financial problems, particularly one that may be teetering on bankruptcy. Bankruptcy rates are currently on par with 2009 levels and some businesses and individuals are declaring bankruptcy for a second time, leaving many of their creditors high and dry.
NACM asked credit pros “what’s the biggest cause of credit loss in recent years?” The responses:
- bankruptcy (34%)
- unresolved invoice issues and discrepancies (31%)
- fraud (19%), and
- insufficient credit investigations (16%).
Bank references can help reduce the risk of all four of those factors due to the wealth of data they provide – current balance as a relative range and figure category, payment history, collateral, days overdrawn, number of returns in the past 12 months, average balance of outstanding loans, and more.
Getting trade references in lieu of banking history has its disadvantages. The info may be biased since “customers are unlikely to send their worst trade references.” There’s also no universal standard for trade references.
The sweet spot: Get both credit histories and trade references, despite the extra work and time investment, to assess both creditworthiness and financial stability.
Free Training & Resources
Webinars
Provided by SkyStem
Further Reading
Cloud-based A/R is rapidly becoming a must-have for businesses of all sizes. But where is A/R technology heading, and what should you expec...
Can automated payment systems be guilty of discriminating against certain groups of people? The federal government says yes, they absolutel...
“Ghosting” isn’t just a phenomenon in the dating world. Credit departments are increasingly being ghosted by customers wh...
Year-end close is when many finance teams are vulnerable to burnout from a seemingly endless, high-priority to-do list of generating annual...
The start of the new year looks a lot like what we saw over 2022: Businesses are struggling to pay their bills. Late payments are highe...
Collections teams are under added pressure to keep after delinquent accounts and press for payments, even if only partial ones. Waiting too...