Think Obamacare will kill COBRA? Not so fast …
Many employers are under the impression that healthcare reform will essentially end the need for COBRA coverage, which is one of the few positives they see in the controversial law.
But some new research suggests that’s not likely to be the case.
Differences in carriers
As some firms know, a report by Kaiser Health News and the Chicago Tribune said it should be safe to assume that most people who qualify for COBRA will instead opt for the subsidized coverage on the exchanges.
However, that report fails to factor in a number of problems COBRA participants can run into should they opt to get coverage on an exchange.
Example: COBRA participants’ carriers may not be offered in some states on the exchanges.
When COBRA participants reside in a state that offers a state exchange and they opt to drop their COBRA coverage, they must use a policy offered in that state’s exchange.
In many cases, they can’t look on the federal exchanges for better rates because the federal exchanges are reserved for states that don’t have a marketplace of their own.
And if the COBRA participant’s carrier isn’t available on his or her state exchange (carrier choice varies greatly from state to state), it’s easy to see how some people wouldn’t want to walk away from their COBRA coverage.
One woman’s reason
The above example is speculative. But the Rockland County Journal News recently ran a story about Anna Imperati, a COBRA participant who looked on the New York health exchange for insurance and opted to stick with COBRA. Her reasons:
Difficulty finding an in-network doctor. In addition to determining carrier availability, COBRA participants must find out whether their current doctor is in-network in state exchange plans. For Imperati, the process was anything but simple.
Unaffordable coverage … even with the subsidy. In order for the exchange coverage to be truly affordable, participants will generally need to qualify for a sizeable subsidy.
Imperati, who earned around $40,000 per year, qualified for a subsidy of $54 per month.
So, based on a cost-estimator on the exchange site, the Journal News determined Imperati would pay between $276 to $588 for a health reform silver plan, which would cover about 70% of her healthcare costs; and up to $847 per month for a platinum plan that would cover 90% of her health costs.
These amounts were actually more expensive than her COBRA coverage.
Free Training & Resources
Further Reading
Finance teams have always known expense fraud is a problem. What’s changed is the scale, the motivation, and the profile of who’...
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) ban on non-compete agreements won’t go into effect in early September and is doubtful to become th...
In April, Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders signed legislation making it illegal for Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) to own or oper...
Environmental, social and governance (ESG) ratings of companies was never as popular as many in the media made it out to be. And the more t...
Why do you have to be so busy? You know there isn’t a trophy for busyness, right? In fact, the best business isn’t about bu...
Year after year, surveys show about half of all employees don’t tap their allotted personal time off (PTO). While some companies allo...