Think Obamacare will kill COBRA? Not so fast …
Many employers are under the impression that healthcare reform will essentially end the need for COBRA coverage, which is one of the few positives they see in the controversial law.
But some new research suggests that’s not likely to be the case.
Differences in carriers
As some firms know, a report by Kaiser Health News and the Chicago Tribune said it should be safe to assume that most people who qualify for COBRA will instead opt for the subsidized coverage on the exchanges.
However, that report fails to factor in a number of problems COBRA participants can run into should they opt to get coverage on an exchange.
Example: COBRA participants’ carriers may not be offered in some states on the exchanges.
When COBRA participants reside in a state that offers a state exchange and they opt to drop their COBRA coverage, they must use a policy offered in that state’s exchange.
In many cases, they can’t look on the federal exchanges for better rates because the federal exchanges are reserved for states that don’t have a marketplace of their own.
And if the COBRA participant’s carrier isn’t available on his or her state exchange (carrier choice varies greatly from state to state), it’s easy to see how some people wouldn’t want to walk away from their COBRA coverage.
One woman’s reason
The above example is speculative. But the Rockland County Journal News recently ran a story about Anna Imperati, a COBRA participant who looked on the New York health exchange for insurance and opted to stick with COBRA. Her reasons:
Difficulty finding an in-network doctor. In addition to determining carrier availability, COBRA participants must find out whether their current doctor is in-network in state exchange plans. For Imperati, the process was anything but simple.
Unaffordable coverage … even with the subsidy. In order for the exchange coverage to be truly affordable, participants will generally need to qualify for a sizeable subsidy.
Imperati, who earned around $40,000 per year, qualified for a subsidy of $54 per month.
So, based on a cost-estimator on the exchange site, the Journal News determined Imperati would pay between $276 to $588 for a health reform silver plan, which would cover about 70% of her healthcare costs; and up to $847 per month for a platinum plan that would cover 90% of her health costs.
These amounts were actually more expensive than her COBRA coverage.
Free Training & Resources
Webinars
Provided by Yooz
Further Reading
Studies show employees miss a couple of days of work every year due to stress. Then there are the folks who come into work anyway but are t...
EBSA FY 2025 Enforcement Snapshot $1.4B recovered for workers and plans 878 civil investigations closed 253 criminal investigatio...
The metropolitan areas where employers and employees want to settle are in flux this decade. COVID-19 accelerated the flexible on-site ...
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is proposing to ban noncompete clauses in employment contracts, long used by companies to prevent highly...
The conditional formatting tool in Excel allows users to apply many different formatting options to data. The benefit: sorting and recogniz...
Your boss has a really good idea – at least she thinks so – and you disagree with it. Awkward, isn’t it? On the one hand, you owe ...