Think Obamacare will kill COBRA? Not so fast …
Many employers are under the impression that healthcare reform will essentially end the need for COBRA coverage, which is one of the few positives they see in the controversial law.
But some new research suggests that’s not likely to be the case.
Differences in carriers
As some firms know, a report by Kaiser Health News and the Chicago Tribune said it should be safe to assume that most people who qualify for COBRA will instead opt for the subsidized coverage on the exchanges.
However, that report fails to factor in a number of problems COBRA participants can run into should they opt to get coverage on an exchange.
Example: COBRA participants’ carriers may not be offered in some states on the exchanges.
When COBRA participants reside in a state that offers a state exchange and they opt to drop their COBRA coverage, they must use a policy offered in that state’s exchange.
In many cases, they can’t look on the federal exchanges for better rates because the federal exchanges are reserved for states that don’t have a marketplace of their own.
And if the COBRA participant’s carrier isn’t available on his or her state exchange (carrier choice varies greatly from state to state), it’s easy to see how some people wouldn’t want to walk away from their COBRA coverage.
One woman’s reason
The above example is speculative. But the Rockland County Journal News recently ran a story about Anna Imperati, a COBRA participant who looked on the New York health exchange for insurance and opted to stick with COBRA. Her reasons:
Difficulty finding an in-network doctor. In addition to determining carrier availability, COBRA participants must find out whether their current doctor is in-network in state exchange plans. For Imperati, the process was anything but simple.
Unaffordable coverage … even with the subsidy. In order for the exchange coverage to be truly affordable, participants will generally need to qualify for a sizeable subsidy.
Imperati, who earned around $40,000 per year, qualified for a subsidy of $54 per month.
So, based on a cost-estimator on the exchange site, the Journal News determined Imperati would pay between $276 to $588 for a health reform silver plan, which would cover about 70% of her healthcare costs; and up to $847 per month for a platinum plan that would cover 90% of her health costs.
These amounts were actually more expensive than her COBRA coverage.
Free Training & Resources
White Papers
Provided by Anaplan
Further Reading
A new proposed rule from the Department of Labor’s Employee Benefits Security Administration outlines how 401(k) fiduciaries must assess ...
Auditors sought a single principle for accounting of software costs. But after months of consideration, the Financial Accounting Standards ...
Do you work in — and have to work against — a Doom Loop? Whether you call it a Doom Loop or something else, you likely under...
Looks like AI won’t be taking the place of all those vacant jobs after all. CEOs at bigger companies — some who laid off a lot ...
You just can’t always tell from an interview if certain applicants may require more praise and (ahem) hand-holding than other job can...
A modern tech stack that gives you the power to analyze your enterprise data in real time may no longer be something on the nice-to-have li...