Think Obamacare will kill COBRA? Not so fast …
Many employers are under the impression that healthcare reform will essentially end the need for COBRA coverage, which is one of the few positives they see in the controversial law.
But some new research suggests that’s not likely to be the case.
Differences in carriers
As some firms know, a report by Kaiser Health News and the Chicago Tribune said it should be safe to assume that most people who qualify for COBRA will instead opt for the subsidized coverage on the exchanges.
However, that report fails to factor in a number of problems COBRA participants can run into should they opt to get coverage on an exchange.
Example: COBRA participants’ carriers may not be offered in some states on the exchanges.
When COBRA participants reside in a state that offers a state exchange and they opt to drop their COBRA coverage, they must use a policy offered in that state’s exchange.
In many cases, they can’t look on the federal exchanges for better rates because the federal exchanges are reserved for states that don’t have a marketplace of their own.
And if the COBRA participant’s carrier isn’t available on his or her state exchange (carrier choice varies greatly from state to state), it’s easy to see how some people wouldn’t want to walk away from their COBRA coverage.
One woman’s reason
The above example is speculative. But the Rockland County Journal News recently ran a story about Anna Imperati, a COBRA participant who looked on the New York health exchange for insurance and opted to stick with COBRA. Her reasons:
Difficulty finding an in-network doctor. In addition to determining carrier availability, COBRA participants must find out whether their current doctor is in-network in state exchange plans. For Imperati, the process was anything but simple.
Unaffordable coverage … even with the subsidy. In order for the exchange coverage to be truly affordable, participants will generally need to qualify for a sizeable subsidy.
Imperati, who earned around $40,000 per year, qualified for a subsidy of $54 per month.
So, based on a cost-estimator on the exchange site, the Journal News determined Imperati would pay between $276 to $588 for a health reform silver plan, which would cover about 70% of her healthcare costs; and up to $847 per month for a platinum plan that would cover 90% of her health costs.
These amounts were actually more expensive than her COBRA coverage.
Free Training & Resources
Webinars
Provided by Insightsoftware
Further Reading
401(k) investment plans remain one of the best ways for Americans who are living well into their 70s and 80s to afford retirement. After al...
A missed federal payroll tax deposit can trigger hefty penalties — they just went up on July 1. But a new IRS program could provid...
Open enrollment may feel far away. It isn’t. Summer is when benefits planning for 2027 starts taking shape. Health benefits are one of...
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is calling on publicly traded companies to report employee compensation. And that’s n...
Public companies expect third-party audits to be thorough and accurate. Many aren’t getting the results they expect. The Public Co...
CFOs and benefits professionals can only do so much to influence employees to invest in a company 401(k) plan. So-called influencers are of...