The $5.4M cell phone reimbursement mistake this company made
Most days you may feel like employees’ cell phones are surgically attached to their hands – at their desks, in meetings, even in the company restroom! But beware: Those little devices can saddle you with a big legal bill.
How big? Try $5.4 million. That’s how much one of your peers is paying out in settlement to a group of its employees – and it’s all because of their cell phones.
Specifically, facility management company ABM Industries is in hot water for requiring employees to use their personal cell phones on the job without reimbursing them for it.
Obvious misstep? Not necessarily.
The employer only expected folks to use their phones for minutes a day at the most. So even savvy businesses could fall into the same trap.
Here are the specifics of this case as well as what you need to watch out for so you don’t meet a similar fate.
Just minutes each day
It’s not like ABM expected its employees to be on their phones 40 hours a week. The company asked their janitorial staffers to clock in and out via their personal smartphones. They were also supposed to use their own phones to send any messages to their supervisors.
That’s not something many companies would think twice about – realistically it probably took less than five minutes a day.
But because employees were required to use their personal phones for these tasks, they should have been compensated for data and cell phone costs under the California labor code.
The kicker: That $5.4 million settlement could’ve been much worse. If the company had taken its chances and gone to trial with the case, it stood to lose $17.7 million as the payout.
5 questions assess your exposure
While this was state law specific to California, many states have laws on the books requiring employers to compensate employees for any mandatory work tools.
Your first step in guarding against a similar fate is thinking about all the possible exposures. Ask these questions to see if your company is vulnerable:
- Do employees check or update their schedules via a scheduling app?
- Do folks use apps or log into your T&E system to record business travel?
- Do employees email or text supervisors or co-workers when they have questions?
- Do staffers access Waze or Google maps to navigate to job sites, client appointments, professional seminars, etc.?
- Do employees clock in or out via their personal phones? (as in this case)
Even if you don’t think you have any of these scenarios, you might want to check with individual department supervisors – there could be things going on in their departments that could be an exposure.
What to do next
In the case of California, where this suit was brought, employers must reimburse their people for “some reasonable percentage” of their cell phone bills if the employer requires them to use their devices for a business purpose – whether or not an employee incurs any costs!
First, you’ll want to see what your own state’s laws are to find out its position.
If your company is responsible for covering these costs, you’ll need to decide whether you expect employees to submit expense reports or determine a realistic percentage that reflects the required usage.
Cite: Marley Castro et al. v. ABM Industries, Inc.
Free Training & Resources
White Papers
Provided by Anaplan
Further Reading
Twenty-six financial firms are on the hook for $392.75 million in fines for securities recordkeeping violations. Several of the brokers, de...
A federal ban on employee non-compete agreements may not go into effect in September after all. Two lawsuits scheduled to be decided in...
Talk about a swift kick in the you-know-where! President Biden stopped at a Sheetz convenience store on a recent campaign stop. Biden order...
It’s not a coincidence that National Payroll Week is always the same week as Labor Day. This year, it’s September 5-9. In an...
You just can’t always tell from an interview if certain applicants may require more praise and (ahem) hand-holding than other job can...
Companies are sending their “road warriors” out at a rate not seen since 2019. A new study shows companies are allocating more ...