Price tag for not hiring applicant with epilepsy: $112k
Here’s another prime example of how expensive it can be to violate federal laws protecting the rights of disabled job applicants.
An man who applied for a job as a machinist journeyman at Amtrak’s Seattle yard won a $112,000 settlement with the proviso that the railway adopt anti-discrimination policies when interviewing and hiring applicants with disabilities.
Amtrak withdrew its decision to hire Shawn Moe after he revealed he took medication to control epilepsy. The company said it denied Moe the job because of safety issues.
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed the lawsuit last year on Moe’s behalf. In addition the monetary settlement, Amtrak has agreed to adopt new policies and training emphasizing its responsibilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Moe has moved on, the EEOC said, and found another job.
Free Training & Resources
Webinars
Provided by Yooz
White Papers
Provided by UJET
White Papers
Provided by Anaplan
Further Reading
The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2024-25 term opened this week – and several employment issues are already on the docket. Here are six...
A big reason employers are still allowing hybrid work is business benefits like reduced operating costs. But it’s also harder to ensu...
A national employer is the latest to find itself on the wrong end of an OSHA whistleblower investigation. Here’s what happened at a ...
Wage and hour litigation presents a recurring financial risk, with new data highlighting variability in employer exposure under the FLSA. ...
Think it’s acceptable to agree with other employers not to recruit their employees if they don’t go after yours? If you’ve ever nodde...
Back pay probably isn’t the first thing that comes to mind when you think of ADA violations, especially if the employee never claimed...