Starbucks fires dwarf barista: Was it discrimination?
How far does a company have to go to accommodate an employee with a disability? That question is at the center of this recent lawsuit.
Here’s what happened: When Starbucks hired Elsa Sallard, a woman with dwarfism, to work at a Texas store, she asked for a stool or a small stepladder to do her job.
Starbucks not only denied her request — claiming a stool could present a danger to both customers and employees — it also fired Sallard on the same day she asked for the stool.
Now the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity has filed a lawsuit against Starbucks, claiming the company denied Sallard a reasonable accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Starbucks spokeswomen Stacey Krum said Sallard was hired on a trial basis, and she was let go after the store manager decided the work was too physically demanding for her to perform.
According to Krum, “Using the stool in that environment just wasn’t a reasonable accommodation in that store.”
Do you think Starbucks handled the situation correctly — why or why not? Let us know in the Comments section.
- Share on
Free Training & Resources
White Papers
Provided by Personify Health
White Papers
Provided by Anaplan
Further Reading
Improperly calculating employees’ overtime pay can be an expensive mistake, as a Cincinnati-based logistics provider recently learned the...
Workplace misconduct isn’t just a legal risk – it’s a financial one. A recent court case alleging a hostile work environment against ...
A Little Caesars franchisee will pay $409,457 for federal wage and hour violations, the Department of Labor (DOL) recently announced. Th...
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) ban on non-compete agreements won’t go into effect in early September and is doubtful to become th...
Employers may need to reverify certain employees’ Form I-9 documents due to recent changes from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)...
Wage and hour litigation presents a recurring financial risk, with new data highlighting variability in employer exposure under the FLSA. ...
