2 tricky payroll areas landing companies in hot water
Overtime pay’s great … when you’re the one earning it! But for employers it’s a major expense and a major headache.
That only gets worse when employees or the Department of Labor decide that someone who should be getting time and a half isn’t. Then there’s not only back pay, but often fines and penalties adding to those totals.
It’s happening more and more frequently these days. Companies of all sizes are having their pay practices called into question.
But you’re far from defenseless. By understanding where most of your peers get tripped up, you can help your own company avoid a similar fate and be sure everyone is being paid in compliance with the law.
We’ve been watching the trends and have ID’d:
- The type of employee most likely to cause OT confusion, and
- The circumstance landing employers in legal hot water for overtime noncompliance.
Check out why these are so troublesome, and how you can be sure you’re handling them correctly.
The most troublesome employees: salespeople
Almost every company has them, and they are a major source of confusion when it comes to pay practices.
They’re your company’s sales staff. And many of your peers are under the mistaken impression that they’re not eligible for overtime because they earn both a salary and commissions.
Wrong. According to federal law, only employees of retail or service establishments who make more than 1 1/2 times the minimum wage and who receive more than half their monthly income from commissions are OT exempt.
It’s tripping up plenty of companies. Groupon is currently facing a class action suit because some 1,000 salespeople didn’t have overtime spelled out as part of their compensation package.
No ruling yet, but experts say it doesn’t look good. And it’s a critical reminder to see how your own salespeople are being compensated.
The most troublesome circumstance: meal breaks
It’s not just certain types of people who cause compensation confusion; certain circumstances crop up during the workday where companies could be coming up short.
The hurdle-du-jour? Meal breaks. There’s a new and costly trend of employees suing their employers, claiming they were either denied on not compensated for meal breaks.
You’ll have to look to your state for its policy on this subject – there’s no federal law mandating them.
But many states do require them and prohibit companies from discouraging their people from taking them.
That’s a particularly tricky area right about now. Businesses are running so lean and most employees have more work than ever. Many of them may be tempted to work through lunch to keep their heads above water.
It’s on your supervisors to make sure their people take every break they’re entitled to … and for Finance to verify they’re being compensated for them.
Free Training & Resources
White Papers
Provided by Anaplan
Further Reading
With TY 2023 forms out the door, you may be thinking about next year-end and what changes you can expect on Form W-2. IRS posted the fin...
Lilly Ledbetter, a former Goodyear employee who became the face of the pay equity movement, died last month at age 86. Here’s a ...
A newly filed FLSA misclassification lawsuit in Massachusetts could have financial implications for FedEx, as it accuses the package delive...
Among the many provisions of the Secure 2.0 Act, several deal with the paperwork responsibilities that fall on retirement plans. The Sec...
In a matter of months, companies will possess first-ever guidelines for environmental credit accounting. Public and private firms will be r...
It’s December, and month-end still isn’t closed. Day six drags on with bank recs unfinished and support scattered across spreadsheets w...
