Reminder: Getting a salary doesn’t preclude OT entitlement
We realize this is Payroll 101, but you’d be surprised by how many companies run afoul of this basic rule: Just because an employee receives a salary doesn’t mean he or she isn’t entitled to overtime payments.
That’s a lesson learned the hard way by a Tampa business. Workers for La Bella Vida Assisted Living Facility were paid a set salary for their scheduled shifts.
The problem: These workers often worked more than their scheduled hours – in some cases, 100 hours or more in a week. That caused their hourly rate to dip well below minimum wage, at times to the equivalent of $3 to $5 an hour.
A Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) investigation resulted in La Bella Vida being required to pay $287,087 in back wages and damages to 20 employees, the Dept. of Labor (DOL) recently said.
Salaried doesn’t mean exempt
Companies can choose to pay nonexempt employees a flat salary – but that doesn’t mean they’re exempt.
You still need to track every hour for these employees. That’s because you need to know when they work more than 40 hours in a workweek so you can pay overtime, and you can’t let their pay rate dip below the federal minimum wage, the FLSA states.
- Share on
Free Training & Resources
White Papers
Provided by UJET
White Papers
Provided by Anaplan
Further Reading
Workplace misconduct isn’t just a legal risk – it’s a financial one. A recent court case alleging a hostile work environment against ...
It’s time for updates: Higher federal per diem rates for business travel have been released by the General Services Administration (G...
Ever since the Secure 2.0 Act laid out changes for workplace retirement plans, employers have been waiting for final regs from the IRS. ...
Normally, an employee’s travel or commuting time is not compensable under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. However, when overnight t...
Mastercard, Inc. has agreed to pay $26 million to settle a pay discrimination lawsuit filed by female, Black and Hispanic employees. The...
One business that claimed a research tax credit ended up with a tax penalty instead. The company fought back in court, but the situation di...
